Skip to content

I am honoured to have won the “Doug Purvis Memorial Prize” for my research on inequality and social mobility

May 31, 2014

It is a particular honour to have my paper, “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility,” chosen for the 2014 Doug Purvis Memorial Prize. The prize is awarded annually by the Canadian Economics Association “to the authors of a highly significant, written contribution to Canadian economic policy.”

That is certainly honour enough, but I’m particularly grateful for another reason.

Doug Purvis

Doug Purvis was a macroeconomist, born in Calgary Alberta, a graduate of the University of Victoria and the University of Western Ontario who completed his PhD at the University of Chicago. He taught at Queen’s University beginning in 1971 until his untimely death in 1993. As a doctoral student, I took courses from him in macroeconomics, and open economy macroeconomics, his areas of expertise.

Purvis was gregarious and generous, but he was also analytical and intuitive, having the capacity to use economic models in a clear-sighted way, appropriate to the problem at hand. An excellent example is his understanding of public sector deficits. It is probably not an exaggeration to say, though others would be in a better position to make this judgement, that he was one of the economists who played a central role in changing attitudes toward persistent public sector deficits during the mid 1980s, a perspective that continues to be part of Canadian public policy culture.

His paper, “Public sector deficits, international capital movements, and the domestic economy: the medium term is the message,” published in 1985 as the Innis Lecture to the Canadian Economics Association played a role in this rethink. Another related paper is called “Some Unpleasant Keynesian Arithmetic.” We should worry about deficits over the long-term, he argued, because they hamper our capacity to use them in the short-term. The flexibility the Canadian federal government had to run significant deficits as a response to the recession that began in 2008 is, in some significant measure, due to the guidance this perspective gave to the conduct of macro-economic policy of the 1990s.

I didn’t really know what Purvis’s political leanings were. But the impression he left with at least one student was about the value, not of “right” or “left”, of “saltwater” or “freshwater”—after all he was a University of Chicago trained economist who had great admiration for James Tobin, an admiration that was clearly reciprocated—but of just trying to figure out what was best for public policy, and using economic theory as a toolbox to guide that search.

About these ads

From → unemployment

2 Comments
  1. Thomas T. Schweitzer permalink

    Congratulations, Miles, for winning the Purvis Price. I think you are a very worthy recipient. I wish you many further successes, and hope to read about them; though my chances are dim: I turned 90 yesterday. But I am patting myself on the shoulder for having recognized a rising star more than 22 years ago. And not only a rising star, but a fine and helpful human being too. Wishng you all the best,

    Tom Schweitzer

    • Tom, thank you so much. You’ve always been so generous. I am glad you are well, and hope we’ll have the chance to meet up for a coffee and a chat.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,945 other followers

%d bloggers like this: